The Best 35mm Film Cameras to Buy in 2022


Film has encountered somewhat of a resurgence in the previous ten years and we’ve seen a multiplication of never-before-made film stocks and, surprisingly, brought some resurrected. However, to get everything rolling in film photography presently, you’ll require a camera. So where would it be a good idea for you to begin?

As a deep rooted, enthusiastic shooter of film – from 35mm to 4×5 and experience with huge number of camera models – I have made this manual for call attention to probably the best 35mm camera models at different costs.

Each pick depends on client experience and, normally, my own inclinations. There are clearly hundreds, on the off chance that not thousands, of choices that others might like. Thus, before you inquire “what might be said about such and such?” kindly remember that I presumably currently considered it, I most likely love the camera, and my choice to pick something different is certainly not an affront against it, yet for this aide, a few decisions must be made.

We’ll be checking out three classifications: 35mm SLR Cameras, 35mm Compact Cameras, and 35mm Rangefinder Cameras. Inside every one of those, they are separated into four evaluating sections: Ultra-Bargain, Bargain, Mid-Range, and Premium.

While utilized cameras can emerge out of an assortment of sources, quality can differ. As we would see it, the best U.S.- based hotspots for rare cameras are Robert’s Camera (UsedPhotoPro) in Indianapolis, Indiana, and KEH Camera in Smyrna, Georgia. Both deal half year guarantees and free delivery on a greater part of items.

At a Glance


  • The Best 35mm Film SLRs
  • Ultra-Bargain SLR: Yashica FX-103 Program
  • The Best Bargain SLR: Minolta X-570 or X-700
  • The Best Mid-Range SLR: Nikon F3/F3HP
  • The Best Premium SLR: Canon EOS-1V or Nikon F6
  • The Best 35mm Film Compact Cameras
  • The Best Ultra-Bargain Compact Film Camera: Minox 35 GL or GT
  • Best Bargain Compact Film Camera: Olympus XA series
  • The Best Mid-Range Compact Film Camera: Rollei 35S
  • The Best Premium Compact Film Camera: Konica Hexar AF or Nikon 28/35Ti
  • The Best 35mm Film Rangefinder Cameras
  • The Best Ultra-Bargain Rangefinder Camera: Canon P/Canon 7
  • The Best Bargain Rangefinder Camera: Contax G1
  • The Best Mid-Range Rangefinder Camera: Minolta CLE
  • The Best Premium Rangefinder Camera: Leica M4-2 or M4-P

The Best 35mm Film SLRs
Ultra-Bargain SLR: Yashica FX-103 Program

This is one of my beloved secret jewels of the film world and can regularly be found with a Yashica 50mm focal point for $100 or less. It utilizes the Contax Yashica (C/Y) blade mount, and that implies it can use all of the incredibly astounding Contax Zeiss focal points, a considerable lot of which actually hold their own even on high-goal advanced cameras. Indeed, a portion of the focal points were great to such an extent that their plans exist right up ’til today in the Zeiss Classic and consequently the Zeiss Milvus series.

The FX-103 Program has four modes: P (Program), HP (High-Speed Program), A (Aperture Priority), and M (Manual). That is undeniably more than most cameras in this value range, in addition to it has an abnormally broad ASA range from 12 to 3200. There truly is nothing to grumble about here.

Comparable options incorporate the Yashica FX-3 and Yashica FX-3 Super 2000.

The Best Bargain SLR: Minolta X-570 or X-700

There are various incredible choices I considered here: Nikon FE, Nikon FM, Pentax K2, or MX, in any case chose Minolta on the grounds that the X-570 was one of my first cameras and they’re forces to be reckoned with – stacked with highlights, and contrasted with the Nikons or Pentaxes, the glass is significantly more reasonable. The X-700 has Program, Aperture Priority, and Manual modes; the X-570 needs Program, which is really not a mode I at any point use with 35mm cameras in any case. In any case, the bodies and highlights are almost indistinguishable.

There are a plenty of incredible Minolta focal points accessible at truly sensible costs; there is additionally the eminent 58mm f/1.2 Rokkor which is a great lump of glass that produces pleasant, marvelous pictures totally open. Indeed, even that focal point can be found at an unobtrusive expense. Your standard 50mm f/1.8 or 50mm f/1.7 Minolta focal points are very reasonable, and 50mm f/1.4 or 55mm f/1.4 focal points are staggeringly reasonable too.

Make a point to check similarity between focal point types (MD versus MC) assuming you mean to utilize the X-700’s program auto mode (MC focal points are opening need or manual as it were).

Robert’s Camera is seldom without a few X-700 bodies in stock.

The Best Mid-Range SLR: Nikon F3/F3HP

The Nikon F3 is perhaps the best camera made. It is absolutely great; it has an unshakable form, astonishing ergonomics, and is perhaps the most reliable camera I’ve at any point gone over.

The F3 is, obviously, the replacement to the amazing Nikon F2, however presently with an inherent light meter (no awkward locater vital) and opening need mechanization. Like Nikon’s FE/FE2/FA models, the F3 has an electronically controlled shade, so it won’t work without batteries. On an individual note, in my involvement in a great many cameras, there is no relationship in regards to life span or dependability and regardless of whether the camera is mechanical or electronic.

The F3HP is essentially the F3 with a high-eyepoint locater (exceptionally decent for those of us who wear glasses). Since the locaters are tradable, a standard F3 can turn into a F3HP by trading in the DE-3 locater, and a F3HP can utilize one of the numerous different locaters accessible – including the fundamental DE-2 locater. There’s even a (extremely cool) midriff level locater accessible (DW-3). Centering screens are likewise effectively exchangeable.

The Best Premium SLR: Canon EOS-1V or Nikon F6

I was enticed to put the Nikon F2 Titan here, however I put away my own predisposition that sees the Titan as my “white whale” of cameras to rather pick not one, but rather two of the best (and last) 35mm cameras made. Why two? Since they are both magnificent, “can’t-turn out badly” choices and the main thing that isolates them is the focal points – assuming you as of now have EF mount focal points, you ought to go with the Canon and in the event that you have F-mount glass, you ought to pick the Nikon.

The Canon EOS-1V, delivered in 2000, was the fifth era of Canon’s first in class proficient series what began with the F-1. Equipped for a surprising 10 casings each second, it was the quickest moving-reflect film camera made at that point – just fixed pellicle reflect cameras like the Nikon F3H, fit for 13 edges each subsequent when utilized with the MN-2 battery, were quicker.

With five metering modes – evaluative, spot, focus spot, halfway, multi-spot, and centering point-connected spot – and 45 zone TTL (from the perspective) stage identification self-adjust, the EOS-1V was a stalwart piece of innovation. It can utilize any Canon EF focal point made since the presentation of the mount in 1987, however you might experience issues with different outsider focal points. Most, nonetheless, turn out great. So fit and tech-filled was the EOS-1V, Canon would keep on assembling it for an additional 18 years until they finished creation of all non-computerized bodies in 2018.

The Nikon F6 – obviously the 6th model in Nikon’s most noteworthy level of expert models that started with the Nikon F in 1959 – was delivered in 2004, overriding the additionally fantastic Nikon F5. While the F5 donned an incorporated vertical hold, Nikon settled on a more modest, conventional body (with discretionary vertical grasp) in the F6 – a plan decision I for one like over the F5 for its flexibility, more modest impression, and 225-gram weight distinction.

The F6 is completely viable, including metering, with practically all F-mount focal points beginning around 1977. Non-AI focal points – except if they have been altered – and the more up to date E series focal points with an electronically controlled opening are not viable, and similarly as with the Canon, you might experience issues with some outsider focal points. Like all Nikon self-adjust SLRs (and DSLRs), the F6’s highest accomplishments were its striking center following capacities through the Multi-CAM 2000 self-adjust sensor module and its 3D Color Matrix metering mode. Like the Canon, the F6 would stay underway for more than 10 years until its suspension in 2020, when it was the final film SLR actually being made.

The Best 35mm Film Compact Cameras
The Best Ultra-Bargain Compact Film Camera: Minox 35 GL or GT

These little fellas are such jewels. They’re perhaps the littlest 35mm camera made (I accept that was the organization’s case at that point), however others approach. It is in no way, shape or form great – the openness control is restricted, the film advance can be fussy (possible because of how little and squeezed everything is), it’s zone concentrate just, and the leaf shade is inclined to disappointment at a higher rate than others.

No camera made is more meriting the modifier “tactful” than these cameras. Zone concentrate just and the limit of opening need just metering framework implies you truly just need to raise the camera to your eye for outlining. The leaf shade and manual film advance mean you won’t ever hear the camera in real life except if you end up being separated from everyone else in a cushioned seclusion room.

There were 18 models delivered north of 24 years, from 1974 to 1998, beginning with the Minox 35 EL. Beside the proper center Minox 35 AL, all models were fitted with one of two Tessar-type focal points – the 35/2.8 Color Minotar and the later 35/2.8 MC Minoxar. While the Minox 35 GT-X or GT-S might be awesome of all, the prior GL and GT – the two of which can be recognized by their orange shade discharge button – are the best worth choices. I additionally have an individual inclination for the Color Minotar over the MC Minoxar.

The main distinction between the two is the expansion of an electronic self-clock in the GT, as well as the movement of the link discharge attachment to a position more averse to bring about unplanned setting off.

Best Bargain Compact Film Camera: Olympus XA series


The Minox 35 is just with regards to the main circumspect, pocketable 35mm camera out there that comes in at a reasonable cost. Planned by Yoshihisa Maitani, boss camera originator of Olympus Optical Co Ltd. what’s more the man behind the Pen, OM, and mju series of cameras, the Olympus XA line included five particular models.

The principal model, the Olympus XA, is a little rangefinder-coupled, opening need (with +1.5 backdrop illumination remuneration) minimal fitted with an authentic six-component 35/2.8 F.Zuiko focal point and a leaf shade up to 1/500 of a second. The accompanying model, the XA1, is a fixed-center simple to use with a 35mm f/4 focal point, modified auto openness, restricted film speed settings of ASA 100 and 400, and greatest 1/250th of a subsequent shade. The XA2 utilizes a four-component Tessar variation 35/3.5 D.Zuiko focal point, leaf screen up to 1/750th of a second, customized auto openness, ASA from 25 to 800, and a 3-position zone center system.

The XA3 held indistinguishable highlights as the XA2 however added programmed DX coding, ASA 1600 help, and the backdrop illumination pay include from the first XA. At long last, the XA4 turned to another five-component 28mm f/3.5 Zuiko “full scale” focal point, customized auto openness, most extreme 1/750th shade speed, and another scale center instrument. Dissimilar to the XA2 and XA3, which just provided clients with the decision of one of three center positions (1.2-1.8m, 1.8m-6.3m, and 6.3m to endlessness), the XA4’s sliding scale considered steady situating anyplace among vastness and the camera’s 0.3m least center distance.

All of the Olympus XA models remain very reasonable and can for the most part be found for under $200. Your decision will rely upon the elements you need. The quicker 35/2.8 focal point and rangefinder coupling of the first XA, alongside opening need, considers somewhat greater adaptability and control contrasted with the XA2 and XA3. It likewise orders the greatest costs of the pack. Assuming that you incline toward a more extensive 28mm focal point, the XA4 is the best approach. The XA1, as I would see it, is an unfortunate decision with no unmistakable advantages – except for some lacks – over different models.

The Best Mid-Range Compact Film Camera: Rollei 35S

In 1966, DHW Fototechnik – replacement of Franke and Heidecke of Rolleiflex and Rolleicord popularity – presented the Rollei 35 at Photokina. The camera – at the time the littlest 35mm made – was planned by Heinz Waaske, boss plan designer of Wirgin, and highlighted a fairly odd, square shaped plan with a battery-fueled CdS light meter and a fabulous, folding Carl Zeiss Tessar 40mm f/3.5 focal point. Later models changed to a 40/3.5 Rollei-HFT Tessar focal point and stamped “Made by Rollei,” however the optics are indistinguishable from the first Zeiss. Moreover, from 1972 to 1973, some Rollei 35 cameras included a 40/3.5 S-Xenar focal point made by Schneider.

As a result of the Rollei 35’s prosperity, in 1967 a better quality variation was gotten ready for market, yet because of the creation’s shift from Germany to Singapore, it would be various years before it saw a group of people. Ultimately, the Rollei 35S – presently the best of Rollei 35 models – appeared with a new, quicker 40mm f/2.8 Zeiss-planned and authorized Sonnar focal point. Like the Tessar, center was controlled by means of a ring toward the finish of the focal point, while the opening and screen speed were set through dials situated to the right and left of the focal point, separately.

Similarly as with all Rollei 35 models, the Rollei 35S highlighted an enormous, brilliant viewfinder without centering helps, which implied the camera was, similar to the Minox 35, zone concentrate just with a match needle metering framework. While the plan of the camera – from its passed on gave shade advance to its peculiar controls – can off-put to some, there’s a great deal of rationale (and appeal) that starts to click once you utilize the camera. Screen speed, gap, and light meter values can be effectively seen and changed while peering down at the camera and the nature of the Zeiss-planned 40mm Sonnar focal point justifies itself with real evidence.

The Best Premium Compact Film Camera: Konica Hexar AF or Nikon 28/35Ti

I’m including two choices here on the grounds that they are both extraordinary and about a similar cost, yet either may better suit your own inclinations.

There are a great deal of choices with regards to premium compacts and a lot of different articles expounded on them. I totally love the Nikon Ti series (in either 28mm or 35mm flavors): they’re fitted with completely incredible focal points and the – at first odd and possibly disconcerting – dials on top are one of my beloved marks of plan in any camera. They’re the main self-adjust simple to use camera I can imagine that permits you to see your gap, openness pay, center distance, and the quantity of openings staying without raising it to your eye. Screen speed, nonetheless, is just shown in the viewfinder.

My own decision top pick, notwithstanding, is the Hexar AF on the grounds that it’s the main self-adjust, auto-advance simple to use that hushes sufficiently up (fantastically along these lines, for this situation) for me to depict it as unnoticeable. The Nikons, the Minolta TC-1, the Contax T2/T3 – all are incredible cameras with first rate optics, yet they’re deprived of attentiveness by their noisy, buzzing film advance engines.

The Hexar AF is undeniably bigger than others because of its essentially bigger (and sublime) focal point, yet these cameras won’t really serenely fit in a pants pocket or shirt pocket at any rate. After you cross that point, the distinctions become scholarly as I would see it – every one of them will truly do fine and dandy in a coat pocket or hanging from a wrist or neck tie. However still, the Hexar is obviously bigger, notwithstanding, the weight is like the others as a result of their titanium-bodied development.

The Hexar likewise dominates in more ways than one because of its bigger development: there is really a slight hold rather than the level fronted, square shaped plans of the others, and the viewfinder is of fundamentally higher amplification – more like a genuine rangefinder than a simple to use. Many compacts have (let’s be honest) wretched viewfinders, with the Leica Minilux being an especially prominent guilty party. This is an inborn compromise as a trade-off for their minor size.

Obviously, assuming that size is fundamentally important, the Nikons, with their more modest bodies and completely retractable focal points, will win out. You totally will not lose anything to the Hexar as far as sheer picture quality – however the Hexar’s focal point is a full stop quicker – and there’s one prominent benefit for the Nikons: lattice metering.

First presented in the Nikon FA and later the F4, Nikon made what is today the most generally utilized openness mode. Different cameras of the time had a spot or focus weighted meter, which can be precarious to use under certain conditions. Grid metering (otherwise called evaluative, multi, and whatnot) utilizes a microchip to dissect a scene, contrast it with comparative scenes in its library of PC information, and pick an openness in view of what it accepts is best for that situation. Underestimated today, it was staggeringly surprising innovation when previously presented and just worked on over the long haul.

The Best 35mm Film Rangefinder Cameras
The Best Ultra-Bargain Rangefinder Camera: Canon P/Canon 7

Whenever we consider rangefinders, our first contemplations float to those of Leica and Zeiss Ikon, the two earliest and most profoundly respected rangefinder camera makers. Yet, the market scene, especially during the 1950s, looked a considerable amount changed – various Japanese makers offered choices more available to those without abundant resources. Nippon Kogaku (later Nikon), Chiyoda Kogaku Seiko (later Minolta), Tanaka Kogaku, Showa Kogaku – there was no lack of choices, a considerable lot of which utilized Leica’s M39 string mount.

The principal rangefinder to hit the market from the Canon Camera Company was the Hansa Canon in 1936, which was fitted with a Nikkor blade centering mount. At that point, Canon didn’t have the means to producer its own focal points, so it went to Nippon Kogaku (Nikon) for help. This participation went on for about 10 years until Canon started fabricating its own Serenar marked focal points. In 1952, the organization delivered the Canon IIIA with its standard Leica M39 pitch string; ensuing Canon focal points were currently viable on Leica string mount bodies.

Leica’s arrival of the progressive M3 in 1954 introduced a test for different makers – its enormous, brilliant viewfinder, more straightforward film stacking, and move from a film advance handle to a switch winder all made for a fundamentally better client experience. Group reacted with the Canon VT in 1956, however it was only after the arrival of the Canon P (frequently alluded to as the “Populaire”) in 1958 that the organization saw genuinely enormous achievement.

The Canon P packaged previously existing highlights from different organizations – the incorporated rangefinder/viewfinder and non-pivoting screen speed dial from Contax, the switch advance from Leica, the enormous 1:1 viewfinder from Nikon to give some examples – and introduced them in a reasonable and truly reliable body. There were likewise a few enhancements: a pivoted entryway, which would ultimately turn into the standard camera plan, 35mm framelines and parallax rectification in the viewfinder, and metal shade drapes, forestalling consuming.


The outcome was the most well known camera the organization had made with almost two times however many deals as any past model.

After three years, Canon would deliver the Canon 7, whose greatest plan change was the expansion of a selenium openness meter into the camera’s top. The Canon 7 was likewise coupled (both in a real sense and metaphorically) with the quickest focal point made at that point: the Canon “Visionary” 50mm f/0.95.

Both the Canon P and Canon 7 are truly beneficial rangefinder choices, with a plenty of reasonable M39 focal points to look over. The Canon P, notwithstanding being the less progressed of the two, orders greater costs, yet can frequently be found for under $225, however costs have been on the ascent. A functioning Canon 7 can be obtained for under $150, however assuming that you expect to utilize the light meter, make certain to check its precision as selenium meters frequently didn’t go the distance.

The Best Bargain Rangefinder Camera: Contax G1

Contax, again spearheading the absolute most inventive innovation, amazed the camera world in 1994 when it delivered a self-adjust rangefinder. That camera was the G1 – a titanium-clad body with electronically controlled openness, self-adjust, and rangefinder framework. Focal points are screw-driven through an in-body engine that turns a pin on the focal point mount, driving the helicoid to and fro.

In contrast to each and every other rangefinder camera to that point (and from that point forward), the viewfinder field-of-view changes relying upon the focal point being utilized. Rather than depending on a little box in the locater for a 90mm focal point, for instance, the viewfinder “zooms” to fill the whole edge. Regardless of your picked central length, the whole viewfinder will be utilized.

Absolutely no part of this itself is motivation to add it to your sack, yet the focal points secure the arrangement. Like most Contax focal points, G-mount glass was made via Carl Zeiss, and they are a portion of the organization’s best work. Going from a 16mm Hologon to a 90mm Sonnar, every one of the focal points are optical things of beauty. As I would see it, the 2.8/90 Sonnar and 2/45 Planar stand apart as the royal gems.

The 90 Sonnar can be found at truly sensible costs and is an absolute necessity have focal point for any G1 or G2 proprietor. It additionally adjusts effectively to most mirrorless frameworks also – however because of the absence of an attention ring on G focal points, center should be constrained by a ring on the connector, which isn’t quite so terrible as it sounds by and by. I suggest either the Metabones or the Fotodiox Pro, with an edge to the Metabones. There are even self-adjust connectors accessible – the Techart TZG-01 for Nikon Z mount and the Shoten GTE connector for Sony E mount. The 28mm and more extensive focal points don’t proceed also on most advanced bodies, however the 45 and 90 focal points sing.

Assuming that you look for Contax G1 bodies, you might discover some portrayed as “green name.” These are refreshed forms with changed ROM and will have a strict green mark inside where the film canister sits. The overhaul permits these bodies to utilize the 21mm and 35mm focal points (ordinary G1’s can utilize the 16mm, 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm focal points). Just the G2 can utilize the 35-70mm zoom, which turns out to be the main rangefinder long range focal point made.

The Best Mid-Range Rangefinder Camera: Minolta CLE

With regards to rangefinders, the Minolta CLE is perhaps the best arrangement available.

Its ancestor, the Leica CL (in some cases marked “Leitz Minolta CL”), was planned working together with Minolta and delivered in 1973. Not at all like numerous other M-mount rangefinders, the CL has framelines for 40mm focal points notwithstanding 50 and 90mm. Leica and Minolta planned and delivered the Leica 40/2 Summicron with the camera as well as the Leica Elmar-C 90/4.

Like the M5 that was delivered one year earlier, the CL uses a CdS meter on a turning arm before the screen that drops down not long before the snapshot of openness. Along these lines, certain focal points can’t be mounted without harming the arm: those with unnecessarily distending back components (frequently really wide-point) and a few folding focal points (which can be utilized on the off chance that you don’t completely implode them).

After seven years, Minolta presented the fundamentally the same as Minolta CLE – one of the most exceptional rangefinders of now is the right time because of the consideration of gap need autoexposure (something Leica wouldn’t achieve until the arrival of the M7 many years after the fact). Dissimilar to the CL, the CLE used a silicon photodiode meter that deliberate the light glistened off the exceptional spotted designing of the shade drape – projecting back components or folding focal points were as of now not an issue.

The CLE likewise added an edge line for 28mm focal points notwithstanding 40 and 90mm focal points – the previous was combined with the arrival of Minolta’s new M-Rokkor 28/2.8. Minolta additionally delivered the M-Rokkor 40/2 and M-Rokkor 90/4 – indistinguishable from the past Leica forms optically, however the Leica variations are single covered, while the Minoltas are multi-covered.

The Minolta CLE isn’t simply better than the Leica CL by each measurement, yet normally, not considerably more costly, and the M-Rokkor focal points are firmly less expensive than their (single-covered) Leica partners.

The Best Premium Rangefinder Camera: Leica M4-2 or M4-P

There are genuine motivations to pick pretty much any Leica rangefinder here – the M3, M2, M4, M5, M6, M7, M-A, and MP are generally commendable for their own reasons. The M3 might be my undisputed top choice due to my affection for 50mm focal points and that lovely, splendid 0.91x viewfinder. Yet, on the off chance that I needed to pick the best all-arounder, it would be either the M4-2 or M4-P.

The creation of the Leica M4 halted in 1972 and its replacement, the Leica M5, was delivered to an exceptionally tepid gathering and unfortunate deals. Unexpectedly, the M5 has ascended in esteem more than some other model throughout the course of recent years – it has essentially multiplied in four or five years. Because of the M5’s market disappointment, Leica restarted creation of the M4, and in 1977 delivered the M4-2 utilizing a smoothed out creation process. The M4-2 saw the virus shoe traded for a hot shoe, the evacuation of the self-clock, and engine drive similarity. Like the M4, it had framelines for 35/50/90/135mm focal points with a 0.72 amplification viewfinder.

After four years the M4-P was sent off, which added framelines for 28/75mm focal points and the brand name Leica red speck on the facade of the camera.

While the later M6 and M7 cameras were fitted with an implicit light meter, they additionally come at an altogether greater expense and the M7 is completely reliant upon its hardware. For my purposes, the M4-2 and M4-P hit the perfect balance of adaptability, assemble quality, feel, and cost. Assuming you incline toward chrome over dark, you’ll have better karma with the first M4, however – most M4-2 and M4-P bodies are dark.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here